1. Hi Guest. If you're not subscribing to us on YouTube yet, you're missing out on car news and reviews. Subscribe to our channel to get notified when we post new videos.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Hi Guest, stickers are available from our online store. and are now half price.

1.4 TSi ACT economy

Discussion in 'Leon Mk3 (2012-2020)' started by Mr Pig, Jan 18, 2020.

  1. Seriously?

    Seriously? Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2018
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    191
    Dunno how accurate the on board consumption indicator is, but more than happy with this:
    [​IMG]
     
    Wilkesy likes this.
  2. Wilkesy

    Wilkesy Active Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2018
    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    23
    School holidays mines about 46+ but at the moment 39mpg
     
  3. Mr Pig

    Mr Pig Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    1,205
    Likes Received:
    309
    I've just filled the tank after running a tank in Eco Mode and driving as economy friendly as I can. Most of my trips are very short, it's a second car, but it was the same type of journeys as before so a fair comparison of Eco Mode and sedate driving vs Sport Mode and using the revs a bit more.

    Previous tanks average about 37-38 mpg.
    This tank was 40 mpg.

    I suspect most of that whole 2 mpg was due to driving style and Eco Mode does pretty much feck all. Sport Mode from now on then...
     
    Tass likes this.
  4. hilly81

    hilly81 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2014
    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    45
    49.24MPG over the last tank for me. Measured, not indicated by the cars trip computer.
     
  5. Seriously?

    Seriously? Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2018
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    191
    Sounds pretty good; I'm assuming that the on board computer is optimistic ( it's a VW group product after all.....o_O )
    Anyone have any idea by how much ? 10-15%?
     
  6. hilly81

    hilly81 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2014
    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    45
    I think it was on about 52 so slightly over optimistic.
     
  7. Glosphil

    Glosphil Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    9
    My previous car, an Octavia vRS diesel was just under 5% optimistic when calculated over 40K miles. My Leon 1.4TSi (150) FR over 5K miles is currently less than 1% optimistic.
     
  8. CupraGeezer

    CupraGeezer Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2018
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    87
    Whenever I've checked my Cupra 280, it's come out at 5-6% optimistic.
     
  9. Seriously?

    Seriously? Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2018
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    191
    So not as bad as I imagined.
    Thanks for your input guys.
     
  10. Tass

    Tass Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2020
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    6
    So far I've discovered it's a difficult beast to drive economically. Because of the ACT setup it seems to use more fuel cruising in a higher gear with a light foot, than it does in a lower gear with moderate revs and ACT activating. Hence my economy figures don't seem to change much either when I'm being light-footed :/

    I'm having to re-train myself not to change up and let the revs drop, but to always keep the revs around 1400-1700rpm (the lowest range that act will cut in)
    I'll try doing a tank-to-tank comparison too and report back.
     
    Mr Pig likes this.
  11. KXL

    KXL KXL

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2016
    Messages:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    122
    So you did 124 miles, and still had 'according ot the car' another 555 miles of range left in the tank? So a theorethical range of 650 miles from 50 litres.
     
  12. Tass

    Tass Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2020
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    6
    I'd love it if it were true! 17 hours between fill-ups would put me somewhere in southern France before I needed to stop.

    The tiredness alert feature would be going bonkers tho :D
     
  13. Seriously?

    Seriously? Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2018
    Messages:
    340
    Likes Received:
    191
    Apparently so - which was one of the reasons I questioned the accuracy of the on board consumption indications.
     
  14. Mr Pig

    Mr Pig Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    1,205
    Likes Received:
    309
    I'd like to see that.

    I'll be honest, I don't understand the ACT system. It's not like you're turning the engine into a three-cylinder one. It's still a four-cylinder when running on two so the rotating mass is still the same. I would have thought that moving the car a certain distance at a certain speed would require the same amount of fuel irrespective of how many cylinders that fuel is being burned in.
     
  15. Tass

    Tass Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2020
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    6
    It's apparently due to the inefficiency of petrol engines when supplying low torque. As I understand it, two cylinders supplying moderate pushing power require less fuel to be injected overall, than four cylinders sharing the same amount of work.

    This 'self study program' for dealers explains it nicely
     
    Mr Pig likes this.
  16. SuperV8

    SuperV8 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    8
    Yes - the total friction of the engine is the same, but by running on 2 cylinders at low load requirements those two cylinders are having to run at higher torque and are running more efficiently, converting more of the fuel into motion - most piston engines are most efficient around their maximum torque - the problem being at cruising speed they are nowhere near their maximum torque. All engines are basically over sized for cruising speeds to give us good acceleration and high top speeds.

    Yes - a car moving at certain speed would require a certain amount of power, but the amount of fuel required to make the required power varies with the efficiency of the engine.

    Tom.
     
    Mr Pig, Tass, OJ9693 and 1 other person like this.
  17. KXL

    KXL KXL

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2016
    Messages:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    122
    Probably why 4 engine passenger planes are disappearing for 2 engine ones. I digress...Saying that, fiat's 0.9l Twin-Air (eg..2 cylinder) motor isn't more economical than 1.0TSIs.
     
  18. martin j.

    martin j. Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    916
    Likes Received:
    262
    I'd still rather have 4 engines, in case one stops there's more chance of staying aloft?
     
  19. KXL

    KXL KXL

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2016
    Messages:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    122
    There's an airline joke, where a 4 engine plane lost an engine, and pilot assured everyone, it was ok, we would just be 1 hour late, then the 2nd went, and the pilot as calm as ever, said, no worries, just 2 hrs late, then the 3rd went, and captain said the same thing, then the passenger commented, 'man, if the 4th engine goes, we would be up here forever....
     
    SuperV8 likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice